Trump administration orders restart of oil drilling along California coast amid Iran war97%

By Clara Harter68%

3/14/2026, 12:57:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 87.7% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 2,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 571 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (559 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.70% of the article peer group.

The Trump administration invoked a Cold War-era law to restart offshore drilling in Southern California, citing national security needs to produce more oil amid the Iran war. 
Gov. Newsom accused Trump of using the pretext of war to open California’s coastline to Big Oil, said this “wouldn’t lower prices.” 
Environmental advocates express alarm about orders to restart offshore drilling at the site of a devastating 2015 oil spill in Santa Barbara. 
President Trump is asserting executive authority to demand the controversial resumption of offshore oil drilling along California’s coastline as gas prices soar amid the ongoing war with Iran. 
On Friday, Trump signed an executive order giving the Department of Energy the ability to use a Cold War-era law known as the Defense Production Act to accelerate oil and gas development. 
Energy Secretary Chris Wright quickly responded with an order directing Sable Offshore Corp. to restore operations of the Santa Ynez Unit and Santa Ynez Pipeline System along the Santa Barbara County coast. 
“Today’s order will strengthen America’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system vital to our national security and defense, ensuring that West Coast military installations have the reliable energy critical to military readiness,” Wright said in a statement. 
Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted the action as “an attempt to illegally restart a pipeline whose operators are facing criminal charges and prohibited by multiple court orders from restarting.” 
He pledged legal action against the move. 
“Donald Trump started a war, admitted it would spike gas prices nationwide, and told Americans it was a small price to pay,” Newsom said. 
“Now he’s using this crisis of his own making to attempt what he’s wanted to do for years: open California’s coast for his oil industry friends so they can poison our beaches.” 
Friday’s announcements seek to make good on previous threats from the Trump administration to force the resumption of offshore oil drilling in California. 
They also follow years of effort from Houston-based Sable Offshore Corp. to revive dormant oil infrastructure along the Santa Barbara County coast. 
Environmental organizations, local residents and state political leaders have strongly opposed such resumption, citing potential dangers to ocean health. 
Sable has faced particular backlash over its efforts to restart a pipeline that ruptured in 2015, causing one of the biggest oil spills in state history. 
Talia Nimmer, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, decried Trump’s executive action as a “revolting power grab by an extremist president.” 
“Trump is misusing this Cold War-era law just to help a Texas oil company skirt vital state laws that protect our coastline, and Californians will pay the price,” Nimmer said in a statement. 
Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill.” 
Sable’s Santa Barbara County facilities could produce around 50,000 barrels of oil a day, replacing nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign crude each month, according to the Department of Energy. 
Still, this represents a drop in the bucket compared with the estimated 20 million barrels a day currently held up by Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz in response to ongoing American and Israeli attacks. 
Two weeks into the Iran war, crude oil has reached $100 a barrel, and the average price of gas in California has topped $5.40 a gallon, according to the American Automobile Assn. 
Times staff writer Grace Toohey contributed to this report. 
Confirmation Bias
8.8%
Anchoring Bias
5.3%
Availability Heuristic
8.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
87.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
10.9%
Negativity Bias
47.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
15.4%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
28.4%
Straw Man
3.9%
Appeal to Authority
17.5%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
10.2%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
17.7%
Bandwagon
3.3%
Appeal to Emotion
36.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
19.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
6.3%
Anecdotal
8.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
51%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
27.1%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

571 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.