Mark Ruffalo won’t even talk to Jews anymore - Blogs 93%

By Andrea Widburg87%

7/23/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 88.4% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 455 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,614 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the article peer group.

Although there were definitely non-Jews who were a major part of Hollywood's early years, it was Jews who turned their primitive New York Nickelodeons into the big Hollywood studios that created American entertainment for decades -pro-American, pro-Christian, philosemitic entertainment, I might add. 
Mark Ruffalo , a working-class kid, went to this Jewish-created city and industry, got himself a career, and is now worth at least $35 million. 
He's also a passionate antisemite who cannot even tolerate speaking to Jews. 
Ruffalo's antisemitism is purely a product of his leftism. 
He's bought into the dishonest narrative that the so-called "Palestinians" (the descendants of the raff and scaff of the Ottoman Empire who drifted into a malarial wasteland beginning in the 1930s) are the true (and brown) indigenous people of the land, while the Jews, who have continuously occupied that land for 3,400 years, are white, colonial invaders. 
This historically false narrative means that Ruffalo can ignore the October 7 massacre, ignore Israel's three-week delay after the massacre as it desperately sought a peaceful resolution to getting the lead terrorists to justice, ignore Israel's exquisite care to protect enemy Gazan civilians even as Hamas hid its fighters and armories among them, ignore how Israel fed the enemy population throughout the war, and ignore the fact that, under "genocidal" Israel's aegis, the populations in Gaza and the West Bank have steadily expanded for generations. 
That's how we get to the point at which Ruffalo, speaking to Mehdi Hasan (an American-hating Brit who supports terrorist organizations but was nevertheless given American citizenship in 2020), proudly boasts about how he maintains his adamantine ignorance. 
It turns out that he simply refuses to speak to Jews who challenge his worldview: 
Mark Ruffalo says he's done talking to Jewish actors. 
Hey Mark, if that's really how you feel, maybe you should stop playing the Hulk too. 
After all, the character was created by two Jewish legends, Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. 
Or is that different because it works in your favor?... pic.twitter.com/LAafgLODmE 
- Haim gozali (@HAIM__GOZALI) July 21, 2026 
The Incredible Hulk is a fictional character whose anger turns him into a green giant who exists to exact vengeance on evildoers. 
Two Jewish men created him, and one of their inspirations was the Golem , a mythological Jewish character that protects the Jews from harm. 
A large part of Ruffalo's wealth comes from pretending to be this character in movies. 
However, Ruffalo, while apparently marinating in that same anger despite his extraordinarily fortunate life (thanks to the Jews), doesn't channel that anger into justice. 
Instead, he is a grotesque monster ready to join the evildoers in their dire deeds. 
Image created using AI. 
Confirmation Bias
45.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
18.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
11.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
4.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
5.5%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
3.5%
Negativity Bias
54.5%
Self-Serving Bias
5.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
7.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
14.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
17.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
16.5%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.6%
False Dilemma
4.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
9.2%
Red Herring
18.7%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
27.7%
Begging the Question
3.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.3%
Tu Quoque
3.5%
Burden of Proof
37.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
17.8%
Anecdotal
23.5%
No True Scotsman
12.5%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
18%
Unattributed Quote
2.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
10.8%
Biased Writer Voice
88.4%
Indoctrination
40.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
2%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
12.5%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

455 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.