Faulty reasoning signals

• Confirmation Bias - 0%
• Anchoring Bias - 0%
• Availability Heuristic - 12.6% (22 hits)
• Representativeness Heuristic - 0%
• Hindsight Bias - 0%
• Overconfidence Bias - 0%
• Framing Effect - 9.1% (16 hits)
• Loss Aversion - 0%
• Status Quo Bias - 0%
• Sunk Cost Effect - 0%
• Optimism Bias - 0%
• Pessimism Bias - 0%

Article text

Behind the Blog: With Blogs Like These, Who Needs a Private Jet

This is Behind the Blog, where we share our behind-the-scenes thoughts about how a few of our top stories of the week came together.

This week, we discuss the Supreme Court, the private jet, and AI on the TV.

JOSEPH: I used to cover court cases and judge’s opinions a lot more back at Motherboard.

Sometimes it was in cases I broke news in, like that time the FBI secretly ran a dark web child abuse website.

Other times it is big decisions that have wider impacts on privacy, surveillance, and government power.

Here’s big news regarding the latter sort of decision.

I first saw news of it on the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s blog.

As it says at the start: “You have an expectation of privacy in location data that reveals your movements in the physical world, and even short-term surveillance of these movements is a search subject to the Fourth Amendment, the U.S.

Supreme Court ruled today in Chatrie v.

United States.”