BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Hindsight Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 394 faulty-reasoning hits from 152 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (12,168 of 17,102 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

On Friday's show: We get the latest on dramatic flooding in the Hill Country. 
And Harris County D.A. 
Sean Teare discusses his office’s efforts to investigate last week’s shooting death of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo by an ICE agent. 
Also this hour: We conclude our weeklong series examining the state of several areas of life in Greater Houston by discussing the state of our region's arts and culture scene. 
Then, we break down The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of the week. 
And we reflect on parallels between last week's ICE shooting and a death at the hands of law enforcement in the 1970s that transformed the Houston Police Department and led to what became known as The Chicano Squad. 
Audio from today's show will be available after 11 a.m. 
CT. 
We also offer a free podcast here, on iTunes, Stitcher and other apps. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
25%
Hindsight Bias
25%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
9.2%
Loss Aversion
8.6%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
43.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
19.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
25%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
25%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
9.2%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
13.2%
Indoctrination
25%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
8.6%

152 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.