Gov. Greg Abbott orders state health agencies to crack down on ‘birth tourism’ 81%

By Andrew Schneider88%

7/21/2026, 8:51:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 1,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,872 of 19,798 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Greg Abbott has issued an executive order to crack down on the practice of "birth tourism." 
The move appears to be a response to the recent U.S. 
Supreme Court ruling upholding birthright citizenship, despite efforts by President Donald Trump to restrict it. 
Abbott's order directs six health-focused state agencies to investigate schemes aimed at helping non-citizens travel to the United States illegally for the alleged purposes of giving birth and securing U.S. citizenship for their children. 
"Texas will not tolerate the exploitation of our immigration laws by individuals traveling to the United States illegally or under false pretenses to give birth and secure citizenship for their child," Abbott said. 
"This executive order directs state agencies to investigate birth tourism schemes and hold accountable any provider that facilitates this fraud. 
U.S. citizenship is not for sale, and Texas will put a stop to individuals seeking to profit from birth tourism." 
The nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute estimates that, at most, the number of babies born to tourists visiting the U.S. is less than 30,000 out of more than 3.5 million births per year. 
"There’s nothing in the law that says that somebody can’t come to the United States as a tourist when they’re pregnant," said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. program at the Migration Policy Institute. 
"We had a member of our World Cup team who was born in the United States just by accident because the airline decided that this soccer player’s mom was too pregnant to get on a plane to go back home, even though that was her intention to go back home and give birth." 
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. 
Constitution automatically conveys U.S. citizenship on anyone born in the United States, regardless of the legal status of their parents. 
The U.S. 
Supreme Court, in its final decision of the 2025-2026 term, ruled that President Trump could not limit the practice of birthright citizenship. 
"I think ultimately this is the behavior of a sore loser, someone like Greg Abbott who’s unhappy with the ruling of the Supreme Court," said Austin-based immigration attorney Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, "and now the state is looking for other ways to enforce something that is entirely legal." 
Lincoln-Goldfinch worries the order could make hospitals wary of treating pregnant immigrants, endangering the lives of mothers and children alike. 
Houston-based immigration attorney Gordon Quan shares her concern, and said that medical practitioners may be forced into the position to determine pregnant women's legal status before they can even offer treatment. 
"You want to make sure that mothers have an opportunity for safe delivery, no matter what their status is, whether they be legal or undocumented," Quan said. 
"I think this endangers mothers who are simply having children in the state of Texas, and there’s no useful purpose." 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
2.3%
Availability Heuristic
18.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
17.4%
Loss Aversion
9.9%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
10.7%
Negativity Bias
23.3%
Self-Serving Bias
6.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
9.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.6%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
9.6%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.8%
False Dilemma
4.2%
Slippery Slope
14.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
10.9%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.2%
Begging the Question
6.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
2.3%
Tu Quoque
9.6%
Burden of Proof
4.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
18.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
2.5%
Indoctrination
4.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

477 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.