Truthout73%

Attempts to Charge People With Assaulting Immigration Agents are Falling Apart 56%

By Chris Walker51%

7/21/2026, 8:52:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (8,894 of 19,795 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the article peer group.

An examination of cases in which people were arrested for supposedly assaulting an immigration agent finds that nearly half of those charges were either dropped or resulted in no conviction  suggesting that federal law enforcement has engaged in widespread misconduct in carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign. 
The New York Times report, published on July 18, examined the close to 550 cases in which individuals  generally protesters and/or immigrants  were arrested for assault due to their alleged conduct during interactions with immigration agents since President Donald Trump returned to office. 
Of those arrests, 459 cases have been resolved so far. 
Of those, 246 cases ended in a guilty plea from those who were charged. 
Only four cases that went to trial resulted in a conviction. 
Conversely, 213 of the total assault cases observed resulted in jury acquittals, judges tossing out the charges, or prosecutors withdrawing the case. 
The DOJ is accustomed to a higher success rate, with around 90 percent of people who face charges from the department typically either being found guilty or making a guilty plea arrangement. 
“There seems to be a pattern of charges being filed without any merit,” former Chicago-based federal prosecutor Jimmy Arce told the Times. 
The report comes as federal immigration agencies, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), are facing renewed scrutiny for their violent tactics in cities across the U.S. 
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) temporarily suspended ICE agents from engaging in traffic stops after agents shot and killed two men, one from Maine and the other from Texas. 
Neither individual was engaged in illegal actions at the time of their stop. 
After that enforcement action was halted, President Donald Trump intervened, demanding on Truth Social that the pause be lifted. 
“We CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP! 
Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal’s hands,” Trump wrote. 
In the wake of these killings, new polling reveals that most Americans are deeply distrustful of ICE. 
According to an Economist/YouGov poll published on Tuesday, only 38 percent of voters say they have “a great deal” of or “some” confidence in the agency. 
Meanwhile, 53 percent said they have “only a little” or no confidence “at all” in ICE. 
A plurality of respondents, 48 percent, said they’d like to see the agency abolished, with 40 percent disagreeing. 
Trump himself has seen his polling numbers on immigration slip dramatically. 
Once a strong issue for the president, only 39 percent now approve of how he’s handling immigration, according to the poll, while 54 percent disapprove. 
Confirmation Bias
4.9%
Anchoring Bias
7.1%
Availability Heuristic
4%
Representativeness Heuristic
7.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
7.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
2.9%
Negativity Bias
21.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.8%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
2.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16%
Red Herring
6%
Bandwagon
4%
Appeal to Emotion
3.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
4.9%
Biased Writer Voice
11.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

451 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.