AP News52%

Interior Department narrows Endangered Species Act protections 53%

By https:47% apnews.com37% author40% matthew-brown81% Wufei Yu81% Matthew Brown59%

7/11/2026, 12:22:49 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 382 faulty-reasoning hits from 408 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (6,688 of 14,190 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the article peer group.

Banners of former President George Washington and President Donald Trump hang above an entrance to the Department of the Interior, Thursday, June 25, 2026, in Washington. 
(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) 
WUFEI YU and MATTHEW BROWN 
PHOENIX (AP)  The Trump administration finalized a rule Friday that changes how agencies enforce the Endangered Species Act and eliminates a key protection for imperiled wildlife against logging, oil drilling and other activities. 
The administration narrowed the definition of “harm” under the landmark law  a change with broad implications. 
For decades, the government defined harm broadly to include encroachments on places with threatened and endangered animals. 
The change announced Friday would allow oil and gas drilling, mining, logging and and other development on critical wildlife habitats so long as the animals themselves aren’t killed or injured. 
Environmentalists warned the move could cause some species to go extinct by opening the door to habitat destruction . 
Industry representatives and their Republican allies have long argued the landmark 1973 environmental law is wielded too broadly, to the detriment of economic growth. 
Administration officials said they were returning the law to its original intent, following a 2024 Supreme Court decision that limited the authority of federal agencies to interpret environmental statutes passed by Congress. 
They described the government’s prior definition of harm as an intrusion on private property rights. 
It’s among a suite of changes to wildlife protections that officials have pursued under President Donald Trump. 
“For years, federal agencies abused the ESA to obstruct lawful land use and burden American families and businesses,” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. 
The change was first proposed in April 2025 and environmentalists fought unsuccessfully to block it. 
Habitat destruction is the biggest cause of extinction, according to wildlife advocates. 
“This is one of the most horrific attempts to harm wildlife in American history and a gift to the oil barons and foreign mining companies,” said Aaron Weiss, the executive director of the Center for Western Priorities. 
The Endangered Species Act is credited with bringing back iconic animals  including the bald eagle, American alligator and California condor  from the brink of extinction. 
Republicans rolled back several provisions of the law in Trump’s first term, only to have those moves reversed under Democratic President Joe Biden. 
Brown reported from Billings, Montana. 
Brown is based in Billings, Montana. 
He covers breaking news, the environment, politics, energy, crime and more. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
7.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
17.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.6%
Primacy Effect
6.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
9.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.8%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
4.7%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
9.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
9.1%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

408 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech345writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Aaron Weiss

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words59% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 pts
Writer 0%Aaron Weiss 100%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.