AP News48%

ACA insurers propose double-digit premium hikes for 2027 23%

By https:49% apnews.com37% author39% ali-swenson43% Ali Swenson43%

7/8/2026, 11:00:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 800 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (10,806 of 13,944 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the article peer group.

Obamacare premiums surged this year. 
A new analysis shows it’s likely to happen again in 2027 
A man walks by an healthcare insurance office in Hialeah, Fla., July 27, 2017, (AP Photo/Alan Diaz, File) 
The healthcare.gov website is seen on Dec. 14, 2021, in Fort Washington, Md. 
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) 
NEW YORK (AP)  Middle-income Americans straining to pay for Affordable Care Act health insurance are unlikely to get relief next year, according to a new analysis that shows insurers in the marketplace are proposing a second straight year of double-digit premium hikes. 
Across the 77 insurers in the ACA program that have submitted rate filings that are publicly available, the median proposed premium increase for 2027 is 14%, according to Wednesday’s analysis from the healthcare research nonprofit KFF. 
The insurers cited mounting healthcare costs, federal regulatory changes and the recent expiration of pandemic-era enhanced subsidies as the biggest factors driving premiums higher. 
The rise in premiums adds to what already was a significant jump in 2026, when the median rate increase was 20%, according to KFF. 
While most Americans in Obamacare still qualify for subsidies that protect them from paying the full premiums, middle-class enrollees who don’t get those subsidies will face an especially stark increase in costs. 
That group includes households with incomes at or above 400% of the poverty level  about $63,000 per year for an individual or $129,000 for a family of four. 
The rate increases come as federal lawmakers have proposed various policy changes to overhaul the expensive U.S. healthcare system, but no comprehensive legislation has amassed enough support to pass. 
The higher costs are contributing to Americans’ existing worries about overall affordability , a concern that many voters say is front of mind with November’s midterm elections looming. 
Insurers cite rising costs and a smaller, sicker covered population 
Health insurers must send filings to regulators every year, explaining what they expect to see in premium rate changes for individual market health plans for the coming year. 
Next year’s rates will be finalized later in the summer, but KFF’s analysis looked at those in the ACA marketplace that already are public across 16 states and Washington, D.C., to get an early glimpse at what insurers are saying. 
The report measured insurers’ premium increases as an average across all types of plans  bronze, silver, gold and platinum. 
The analysis found that insurers listed rising costs across the healthcare sector  from hospital visits to prescription drugs, the workforce and sicker patients  as the biggest cause of rising premiums. 
Overall inflation contributed to that pressure, driving prices higher across the entire economy. 
Insurers also blamed the expiration of federal subsidies that had offset costs for many people and caused the Affordable Care Act program to balloon in size in recent years. 
When those tax credits expired in January, many plan costs skyrocketed. 
That prompted large swaths of enrollees to depart the marketplace, leaving sicker patients who carry higher risks and costs, and driving premiums higher. 
New state-by-state data posted by the Trump administration shows that the overall ACA marketplace shrunk by more than 2.5 million people over the past year, with some states seeing declines amounting to nearly a third of their enrollee population. 
Some insurers added that federal regulatory changes contributed to their requests for higher premiums. 
For example, they said new enrollment and eligibility requirements instituted by the Trump administration could affect the overall population of ACA enrollees. 
While Affordable Care Act enrollees make up less than 10% of the population, similar cost drivers are likely to make other private plans, including employer-sponsored plans, pricier too, according to KFF’s analysis. 
Findings align with other analyses 
Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms also published an analysis of preliminary ACA insurer rate filings last month. 
Like KFF’s, it projected double-digit premium increases in the marketplace next year. 
Stacey Pogue, a senior research fellow at the center who authored the report, said the enrollees most affected by the rising premiums will be those who don’t qualify for financial help. 
She said those people already saw the most significant increases to their premiums in 2026, with some of their premiums doubling or tripling. 
“Those are the folks who kind of got a double whammy” this year, she said. 
Pogue said the rate filings are demonstrating what many analysts had expected: that the expiration of enhanced tax credits would cause healthy Americans to flee the marketplace and leave a sicker patient population that relies more heavily on insurance. 
“When the healthy people leave, the prices go up,” she said. 
“The analysts all predicted that, and now that’s what we’re seeing.” 
Swenson covers politics and the information landscape for The Associated Press. 
She is based in New York. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
3.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
5.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

800 words analyzed.

Voice attribution · Experimental

Who is speaking?

See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.

3speakers37%attributed speech507writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Stacey Pogue

0%flagged-word coverage
130 attributed words44% of attributed speech20% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.