What’s Really Driving the Left’s Wins In Democratic Primaries? 92%

By Right Now0% Perry Bacon0%

7/17/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 328 faulty-reasoning hits from 157 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,384 of 16,999 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the article peer group.

You can watch this episode of Right Now With Perry Bacon above or by following this show on YouTube or Substack. 
You can read a transcript here. 
Incumbent Democrats and establishment candidates are falling across the country to more progressive opponents, most notably in recent primaries in Colorado and New York. 
What’s driving these surprisingly results? 
A host of factors, including more liberal attitudes among Democratic voters, the robust get-out-the vote operations that the Democratic Socialists of America have built in cities like New York, and the party base’s frustration with the Democratic leadership for losing twice to Donald Trump. 
In the latest edition of Right Now, Julia Azari and Seth Masket, two professors who specialize in studying party politics, break down which factors are most and least important in this recent leftward surge in the party. 
Azari teaches at Marquette University; Masket at the University of Denver. 
Confirmation Bias
28%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
3.2%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
15.3%
Primacy Effect
23.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
30.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
15.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
28%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
23.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
28%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
13.4%

157 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.