OPB10%

Portland OB-GYN new memoir ‘Labor’ highlights abortion access and providing medical care in a mobile health clinic 5%

By Malya Fass0%

7/17/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 5% (16,399 of 17,212 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the article peer group.

Mary Fariba Afsari is an OB-GYN based in Portland, and she’s written a new memoir, called “Labor: One Woman’s Work.” 
She tells the story of her practice and why she chose to take a 31-foot RV and turn it into a mobile women’s health clinic. 
She also weaves her personal narrative with the story of her grandmother in Iran, who died as a young woman from an illegal abortion. 
We’ll talk with Afsari about the book and her work. 
<i><b>“Think Out Loud®” broadcasts live at noon every day and rebroadcasts at 8 p.m.</b></i> 
<i>If you’d like to comment on any of the topics in this show or suggest a topic of your own, please get in touch with us on </i><a href="https://www.facebook.com/OPBTOL/" target="_blank" rel=""><i>Facebook</i></a><i>, send an email to </i><a href="mailto:thinkoutloud@opb.org" target="_blank" rel=""><i>thinkoutloud@opb.org</i></a><i>, or you can leave a voicemail for us at </i><a href="tel:5032931983" target="_blank" rel=""><i>503-293-1983</i></a><i>.</i> 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
14.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
14.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
32.1%

162 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.