BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 71.8% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,197 of 18,403 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the article peer group.

The Trump Administration is going after California’s coast. 
To curb California’s power to stop harmful development off of its coast, NOAA has announced a new review of the California Coastal Management Program. 
The program is California’s way of implementing the Coastal Zone Management Act and allows more power for California to review and check federal projects off our coast. 
While NOAA conducts routine, periodic performance reviews of state coastal programs, it appears that this is deliberately to strip power from the state in order to advance more oil and gas developments and “space port” developments desired by Trump acolytes like Elon Musk. 
Jen Savage of the Surfrider Foundation joins the program to talk about this and other threats from the Trump Administration to the California coast. 
Want to learn more? 
Check out the Surfrider Foundation! 
"The EcoNews Report," July 18, 2026 
Confirmation Bias
61.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
18.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
45%
Negativity Bias
71.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
28.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
18.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
28.9%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
28.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
2.7%
Appeal to Emotion
13.4%
Begging the Question
16.1%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
28.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
45%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
18.1%
Anecdotal
16.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
55.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
16.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
68.5%
Indoctrination
24.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6%

149 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.