Sea Dogs rally to beat Fisher Cats 1%

By Scott Martin1%

8/7/2026, 6:14:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (29,506 of 29,694 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

Miguel Bleis hit a three-run home run to cap a six-run seventh inning for the Portland Sea Dogs in their 7-4 win over the Fisher Cats in an Eastern League game on Friday in Manchester, New Hampshire. 
Ahbram Liendo and Will Turner walked, and Brooks Brannon singled to load the bases with one out for Portland in the seventh. 
After Johanfran Garcia struck out, Yoeilin Cespesdes walked to drive in a run and Nate Baez hit a two-run single to tie it at 4-4. 
Bleis hit a bomb to left field to give Portland the lead. 
Portland took a 1-0 lead in the top of the third when Brannon hit a 18th home run of the season. 
New Hampshire scored twice in the bottom of the inning to take the lead. 
Aaron Parker added a two-run home run in the bottom of the fifth. 
Baez was 3 for 5 with two RBI, while Bleis had two hits and three RBI. 
Left-handed pitcher Devin Futrell made his Double-A debut for Portland, allowing four runs on eight hits in five inning. 
He struck out five and walked one. 
Patrick Halligan pitched two scoreless innings to earn the win and Jeremy Wu-Yelland pitched two innings to earn the save. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

213 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.