Portland I-295 ramp closed for police investigation 4%

By Morgan Womack9%

8/6/2026, 4:27:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 4% (28,574 of 29,510 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the article peer group.

A southbound ramp to I-295 in Portland is closed Thursday for a police investigation. 
The ramp at Washington Avenue and Bates Street is expected to be closed until mid-morning, according to a Facebook post by the Portland Police Department around 1 a.m. 
Thursday. 
A spokesperson for the police department did not immediately respond to questions about the investigation. 
This is a developing story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 40.0%Morgan Womack: 2.1%The Portland Press Herald: 2.2%Availability Heuristic40.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 2.2%The Portland Press Herald: 3.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 1.8%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 2.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 2.9%The Portland Press Herald: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 5.2%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 1.8%The Portland Press Herald: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 5.4%The Portland Press Herald: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 1.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 40.0%Morgan Womack: 2.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Unattributed Quote40.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 2.4%The Portland Press Herald: 3.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 2.2%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Morgan Womack: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

70 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker40%attributed speech42writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words100% of attributed speech0% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Portland Police Department: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.