Lindsay Clancy’s diary chronicled desperation and ‘brain fog’ before she killed her 3 kids 10%

By Associated Press74%

8/3/2026, 5:38:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 955 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (24,445 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

Lindsay Clancy’s diary chronicled desperation and ‘brain fog’ before she killed her 3 kids 
Clancy’s journals were read in court Monday, and reveal her mental struggles including thoughts of suicide and anxiety. 
EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. 
If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988. 
PLYMOUTH, Mass. 
(AP)  After an opening week of wrenching testimony and a jury trip to the home where Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children, her murder trial resumed Monday with diary entries from the months leading up to the killings in a coastal Massachusetts town in 2023. 
Clancy described feeling anxious and overwhelmed with motherhood, including her struggles to get her newborn Callan to sleep and constant worries of his being sick. 
She also expressed concerns about going back to work as a labor and delivery nurse, not being able to breastfeed, and feeling disconnected from her children and her then-husband. 
“I’m so desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone that my mind is trying to find something physically wrong with me,” she wrote in a Nov. 18, 2022, entry. 
Clancy’s defense says she was a loving mother who was overmastered by postpartum psychosis, a dangerous psychiatric condition that afflicts a small proportion of women after childbirth and affects their hold on reality. 
Prosecutors contend that she acted intentionally and should be held criminally responsible for the deaths of Callan, Dawson and Cora Clancy, who ranged in age from 8 months to 5 years. 
Clancy’s lawyers don’t dispute that she killed the children. 
But in the criminal trial and a medical malpractice lawsuit, her attorneys say the 35-year-old had bipolar disorder that wasn’t fully diagnosed until after the killings. 
Her attorneys say her condition seemed to worsen on an ever-shifting lineup of psychiatric prescriptions, some of them problematic for bipolar patients. 
In the three months before the killings, various clinicians prescribed a range of antidepressants, sleep aids, an antipsychotic and other medications while she reported increasingly profound insomnia, anxiety, despair and confusion about what was real, according to her lawsuit. 
Both the prosecution and her defense attorney read pages from her journal Monday as she chronicled those difficult months. 
“I want help. 
I want to be well,” Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington read from one journal entry. 
She also wrote of feeling “incredibly sad and guilty” about not breastfeeding and was “obsessed” with Callan’s sleep and nap schedule. 
“I have crazy brain fog. 
I feel like I can’t make a plan,” she wrote in another, undated entry. 
“I live moment to moment waiting for the next nap time. 
I’m terrified of Cal getting overtired now because I feel can’t help him.” 
In separate lawsuits, Lindsay and ex-husband Patrick Clancy allege that various providers failed her, and should have recognized she was a risk to herself and the children. 
The providers, at least those who have responded to date, deny the allegations and dispute that she clearly told them she intended to harm the kids. 
Lindsay Clancy was seeking help before the killings 
When she sought care at a postpartum depression program in late December 2022, providers noted that her symptoms might be due to medication, according to her lawsuit. 
It says those clinicians told her to taper off the antipsychotic drug and then discharged her after a day. 
Clancy checked herself into a psychiatric hospital that New Year’s Eve and spent several days there. 
Once home, she resumed appointments with her psychiatrist, who last saw her for 17 minutes on Jan. 23, 2023, according to her lawsuit. 
The next day, she believed a commanding voice was telling her to “kill the children so you can kill yourself,” according to her lawyers. 
That evening, she asked her then-husband to run some errands, a request that prosecutors cast as a ploy to get him out of the house. 
Father returns home to a shocking scene 
Lindsay Clancy wept at the defense table last week as Patrick Clancy and other witnesses testified. 
He told jurors about returning to a horrible scene at their house: a bloodied bedroom, an open window, his wife on the ground below it, the children in the basement, throttled with exercise bands. 
“She killed the kids!” 
he told a 911 dispatcher on a call played in court. 
Lindsay Clancy remains paralyzed from the waist down because of the fall. 
In the hospital two days later, when a forensic psychologist asked Clancy how she felt, she responded: “horrified.” 
She also asked if she had a lawyer and whether her body and legs were broken. 
She was intubated and could only communicate through written messages on a whiteboard, the psychologist testified. 
“She then asked, can she have visitors, and where her family is,” Dr. 
Jhilam Biswas of Brigham and Women’s Hospital recalled. 
Doctors testified Monday that 8-month-old Callan was in cardiac arrest when he arrived at a hospital in nearby Plymouth. 
He needed a ventilator at Boston Children’s Hospital to help him breathe, but did have a heartbeat. 
He died after three days. 
Prosecutors will try to keep the spotlight on Clancy 
Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham sought in an opening statement last week to keep jurors’ focus on the defendant, not her doctors. 
“This is not a public debate about women’s mental health and how the medical system treats women,” Buckingham said. 
If convicted of murder, Lindsay Clancy faces life in prison without parole. 
If found not guilty due to a lack of criminal responsibility, she would be committed to a state mental health facility. 
*Associated Press writer Jennifer Peltz contributed from New York. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.8%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 9.0%Associated Press: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Associated Press: 5.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.7%Associated Press: 7.5%Baltimore Sun: 5.2%Negativity Bias18.7%This article: 6.2%Associated Press: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 5.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Recency Bias0.9%This article: 5.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Associated Press: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 7.1%Associated Press: 3.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion7.1%This article: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question0.4%This article: 8.8%Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Special Pleading3.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.3%This article: 15.4%Associated Press: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice15.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

955 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers18%attributed speech782writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words19% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-18.8 ptsWriter: 18.8%Lindsay Clancy’s defense: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.