Human remains found in two separate locations of Monterey County ⁠1%

By Arianna Nalbach⁠0%

8/3/2026, 6:28:19 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (26,322 of 26,463 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the article peer group.

The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office is currently investigating two separate incidents Saturday morning of human remains being found. 
Remains of an infant were reported found and confirmed by officials just after 8:30 a.m. near the 100 block of Struve Road, just off Highway 1 in Moss Landing. 
Just over an hour later, Sheriff’s deputies were dispatched to the 400 block of Old Stage Road in Salinas after a county employee located what appeared to be human remains. 
Both incidents are being actively investigated. 
The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office is asking anyone who may have information related to either incident to contact them at (831) 755-3700. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 2.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 5.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 6.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 6.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 2.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Arianna Nalbach: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.0%

115 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech93writer words
0%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words100% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.