Meet the billionaires behind $336M ‘explosion’ of money in California politics, per new report 64%

By Brandon Pho49%

7/17/2026, 8:51:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 601 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.1% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,561 of 17,926 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the article peer group.

Fifteen billionaires have put a total of $336 million into California and national politics so far this year, a new report released this week shows. 
More than half of them are from the San Francisco Bay Area, where organizers on Thursday rallied at the home of the second-biggest individual political spender on state elections, Ripple co-founder and angel investor Chris Larsen, to announce the report's findings. 
The analysis was published by California Common Good, which advocates for the full funding of education and other social safety net services. 
It found that Larsen personally gave roughly $28 million to various state and local races this year, boosting candidates like East Bay state senate candidate Scott Sakakihara, a former Palantir employee, through his Grow California PAC. 
He also tried to defeat local measures such as San Francisco’s ”Overpaid CEO” tax, Proposition D, and was joined in that effort by venture capitalist Michael Moritz and a host of firms that would have been on the hook for the tax. 
Ripple, Larsen’s cryptocurrency company, spent $56 million across state and federal elections, including roughly $5 million to Golden State Promise, a statewide PAC opposing the California billionaire tax proposal  which nevertheless made it on the November ballot  and $49 million to federal PACs advancing a crypto-friendly agenda. 
Combined with Ripple’s corporate giving, Larsen’s spending footprint across local, state and federal elections reached $93 million, according to the report. 
Larsen’s personal giving at the state level was dwarfed only by Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who individually spent $86 million on a host of moderate, pro-business political action committees across California, largely in reaction to the proposed billionaire tax. 
He also spent $500,000 to oppose the San Francisco CEO tax. 
The report identifies Larsen, Brin, and venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as the top four political spenders on state and federal elections this year  and the lion's share of all 15 billionaires' combined spending. 
Collectively, the four men were behind $209 million in personal spending this cycle, a 147 percent increase over their spending in the entire 2023-24 election cycle. 
Money spent doesn’t necessarily translate into political influence. 
In 2024, Moritz spent millions in the San Francisco election, with little effect. 
This year, Steyer didn’t make it past the primary in the governor’s race, and neither did centimillionaire Saikat Chakrabarti in his run to replace Nancy Pelosi. 
Silicon Valley’s favored gubernatorial candidate Matt Mahan  who raised more than $15 million from C-suites including Brin  flopped in the June primary at sixth place. 
As did their favored challenger to South Bay Congressman Ro Khanna, Ethan Agarwal. 
San Francisco is no stranger to concentrated wealth shaping City Hall, and big-money spenders did well here during the last primary. 
Big business interests of the past include real estate developer Walter Shorenstein, who for decades spent hundreds of millions to buy and build tall buildings, stop the San Francisco Giants from moving to Florida, and cement his reputation as a Democratic kingmaker in local and national politics. 
A source close to Larsen said he and his wife, Lyna Lam, were not home at the time of the demonstration. 
A spokesperson for Larsen declined to comment on the rally or the report. 
The report also said a web of political action committees received millions from California billionaires and big corporations  and found that 20 had already raised a combined $289 million this year. 
That amount towers over the total spending from PACs in the 2024 primary elections, the report said. 
Confirmation Bias
5.8%
Anchoring Bias
14.8%
Availability Heuristic
13%
Representativeness Heuristic
16.5%
Hindsight Bias
6.5%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
4.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.3%
Negativity Bias
34.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.5%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
7.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
8.8%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
3.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
2.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
27.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
7.8%
Anecdotal
12.3%
No True Scotsman
8.2%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
8.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
3.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
26%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
7.2%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
14.6%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

601 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.