The Metro: Discover What’s So Funny About Detroit at The Old Miami tonight 30%

By Alex McLenon30% Tia Graham63% Haley Gavigan36%

7/30/2026, 10:20:07 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (17,845 of 25,265 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the article peer group.

“What’s So Funny About Detroit?” 
will return to The Old Miami on Thursday, July 30. 
In the Groove’s Ryan Patrick Hooper will host comedians such as Zech, Brett Mercer and Heather Jowett. 
Melanie Hearn, an actress and writer from Detroit, will perform as a second-time headliner. 
“I’ve always loved this event because people are actually there ready for a show,” Hearn says. 
She joins The Metro to share more about her career and her connection to Detroit. 
Listen to The Metro weekdays from 10 a.m. to noon ET on 101.9 FM and stream on-demand. 
Never miss an episode  subscribe to The Metro on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, NPR, or wherever you get your podcasts. 
Confirmation Bias
12.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.2%
Loss Aversion
16.4%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
12.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.9%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
41.4%

128 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.