ICE extends no-bid contract for Camp East Montana in El Paso, rejecting calls for closure 47%

By Ryan J. Foley60% Associated Press73%

7/28/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.2% and a BS Rank of 47% (13,670 of 25,563 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to keep one of its largest and most expensive detention facilities open for at least another year despite calls to close it over reported human rights abuses, according to a notice published last week. 
ICE plans to extend the no-bid contract of the firm that runs Camp East Montana in East El Paso through Sept. 30, 2027, at a potential additional cost to taxpayers of $776 million, the notice says. 
This is on top of a $452 million initial contract that the firm, Amentum Services Inc., was awarded in March when it was hastily installed to take over the camp’s operation from a contractor removed for poor performance. 
For months, Democratic members of Congress and several advocacy organizations have called for Camp East Montana to be closed, citing reports that detainees have been routinely mistreated since its opening in August 2025. 
A report released earlier this month by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union alleged that staff routinely beat detainees, denied them medical care, made them live in filthy conditions and fed them inedible meals. 
Reports by federal agencies have also found unsafe detention conditions and that the Army and ICE have wasted millions of dollars paying for unnecessary services. 
At least three Camp East Montana detainees have died. 
The facility at Fort Bliss, an Army base near the U.S.-Mexico border, has housed an average of more than 2,000 male and female detainees a day since Oct. 1, though its population has declined significantly in recent months, according to ICE data. 
“Extending Amentum’s contract while ignoring well-documented abuses is reckless and demonstrates the Trump administration’s full-scale assault on human rights,” said Angélica César, a fellow at Human Rights Watch and the ACLU who was a lead researcher for the report. 
“Instead of holding private contractors accountable, DHS is choosing to perpetuate a system of harm and abuse.” 
Chanel Mann, a spokesperson for Amentum, referred questions to ICE and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, which didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment. 
ICE’s notice was a justification for extending Amentum Services’ contract for a year without a competitive bidding process. 
The agency argued that relocating detainees to other facilities would be “impracticable” due to a lack of available bed space elsewhere. 
Transitioning to a different contractor would require replacing Amentum’s “proprietary infrastructure” and finding new workers, which would lead to duplicative costs, it said. 
“Any lapse in contract coverage would directly threaten the life, safety, and well-being of detainees, severely disrupt law enforcement operations, and expose the government to substantial operational, legal, and humanitarian risks,” the notice says. 
ICE’s notice said the Army’s initial contract, awarded to Acquisition Logistics LLC, “did not accurately reflect ICE’s operational needs or the actual usage of the facility.” 
Acquisition Logistics had no prior experience operating detention facilities. 
In all, Virginia-based Amentum stands to be paid more than $1.2 billion if it operates the camp from March 2026 through September 2027, the notice says. 
The post ICE extends no-bid contract for Camp East Montana in El Paso, rejecting calls for closure appeared first on El Paso Matters . 
Confirmation Bias
12.1%
Anchoring Bias
11.5%
Availability Heuristic
15.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
9.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
6.1%
Loss Aversion
6.3%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
11.3%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
6.3%
Negativity Bias
36.6%
Self-Serving Bias
3.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
6.3%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.2%
Red Herring
3.3%
Bandwagon
6.1%
Appeal to Emotion
13.6%
Begging the Question
3.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
4.3%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.2%
Biased Writer Voice
2.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
6.9%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

538 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.