Boston Herald55%
Lindsay Clancy case: Jury seated in Massachusetts children murder trial 11%
By Flint McColgan0%
7/23/2026, 4:12:31 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 572 faulty-reasoning hits from 665 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (22,784 of 25,471 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the article peer group.
A jury was seated Thursday and opening statements are expected Monday in the case of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury mother on trial for the strangling murders of her three young children in 2023.
But a motions hearing following the seating of the jury Thursday provided a preview of the intensity of the evidence six men and 12 women will have to sit through at trial.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital at the time, is charged with the murder of her three children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months — in the basement of the family home in Duxbury on Jan.
24, 2023.
She also allegedly tried to kill herself afterward, leaping from the master bedroom window on the upper floor to the ground below.
She is now paraplegic and is stationed under psychiatric care at the Bridgewater State Hospital as she awaits trial.
Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, has said she was under a medley of medications for severe postpartum depression and is mounting a psychiatric defense.
On Thursday, Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan repeatedly had to stop both the prosecutor and defense attorney during heated motions arguments.
“Here’s what we’re going to do.
We’re going to end that now,” Sullivan told prosecutor Jennifer Sprague at one point, shortly after he had ended a Reddington argument he also deemed as irrelevant to the motion’s argument.
Reddington and Sprague had some strong feelings about what evidence should be relevant in a trial where Reddington is not contesting that the deaths of the children were at the hands of his client on Jan.
24, 2023.
“The circumstances of this horrific act are not in dispute,” Reddington said.
Patrick Clancy, the children’s father, also had an attorney there, David Meier, pleading for certain evidence, like his own 911 call that night, pictures of the children, and the children’s clothing be restricted to the courtroom and not published by the media.
“What I can’t fathom is the district attorney’s intent to put a circus in front of this jury that’s calculated to just inflame the passions of the jury,” Reddington said, adding that Patrick Clancy is trying to move on with his life and that his extended family is getting hounded and harassed by the public due to “salacious” media coverage.
“I still think it’s reprehensible the way the government is trying this case,” he said of his own motion to limit the number of first responders to testify during the trial, saying that the testimony would be repetitive and serve no purpose other than to emotionally manipulate the jury.
Sprague described Reddington’s arguments as an attempt “to brush past what happened to these children.”
She described the need for so many first responders on the stand because this is not a trial for a single murder, but the murder of three children, each of whom were seen and tended to by first responders at the scene and then evaluated by medical staff and declared dead.
That, she said, multiplies the number of testimonies needed to prove the case by three, and then when one adds that Lindsay Clancy herself was treated and so was Patrick Clancy, that makes for even more needed testimony.
“The commonwealth did not choose the number of victims, the defendant did,” Sprague said.
“The commonwealth did not choose the ages of the victims, the defendant did.
The commonwealth did not choose the horrific nature in which they died, the defendant did.
“It is not the commonwealth putting on a circus or a parade, it’s the commonwealth presenting the evidence in this case to prove that the defendant killed those children and the manner in which they were killed,” she said.
Sullivan took Patrick Clancy’s request under advisement and said he planned to rule on it Friday morning.
He took no action on the defense motion to limit the number of first responders who testify.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.