Quillette64%

Ireland's Antisemitism Crisis with Rachel Moiselle | Quillette Cetera Episode 68 75%

By Zoe Sankey91%

7/23/2026, 5:03:57 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 330 faulty-reasoning hits from 159 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,542 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the article peer group.

In this episode of *Quillette Cetera*, Zoe Sankey speaks with **Rachel Moiselle**, a doctoral student in linguistics at Trinity College Dublin who has become one of the most visible voices against antisemitism in Irish public life. 
Of paternal Jewish heritage and raised Catholic, Moiselle began speaking out after October 7th and found herself, almost overnight, both a target and a lightning rod. 
She and Zoe discuss why a country with fewer than 3,000 Jews devotes so much of its political and media energy to Israel, how anti-Zionism has taken on the fervour of a replacement faith in post-Catholic Ireland, and why Moiselle argues the real problem isn't violence but denial. 
Along the way they turn to her research on Irish Sign Language and the deaf community, the anonymous Sinn Féin politician who hounded her for weeks, and the female friendships both women lost for refusing to stay quiet. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
30.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
30.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
16.4%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
30.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
30.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
23.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
46.5%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

159 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.