Chicago Police Failed to Place Troubled Cop Under Strict Supervision Before He Fatally Shot Partner ⁠56%

By Peter Nickeas⁠64% Casey Toner⁠64% Tom Schuba⁠54%

7/17/2026, 3:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 77.8% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (13,191 of 29,596 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the article peer group.

CarlosĀ BakerĀ wasĀ referredĀ toĀ aĀ programĀ thatĀ subjectsĀ officersĀ toĀ intenseĀ oversight.Ā 
ThoseĀ whoĀ failĀ canĀ faceĀ ā€œsevereā€Ā disciplineĀ orĀ beĀ fired.Ā 
ButĀ BakerĀ wasn’tĀ enrolledĀ beforeĀ heĀ shotĀ OfficerĀ KrystalĀ RiveraĀ becauseĀ aĀ supervisorĀ didn’tĀ respondĀ toĀ anĀ email.Ā 
ChicagoĀ policeĀ OfficersĀ CarlosĀ Baker,Ā left,Ā andĀ KrystalĀ RiveraĀ (Credit:Ā PhotosĀ providedĀ byĀ ChicagoĀ PoliceĀ Department)Ā 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 6.3%Illinois Answers Project: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 3.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 11.5%Illinois Answers Project: 3.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 77.8%Peter Nickeas: 19.4%Illinois Answers Project: 14.2%Framing Effect77.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Peter Nickeas: 10.4%Illinois Answers Project: 3.1%Negativity Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 25.0%Peter Nickeas: 24.0%Illinois Answers Project: 7.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)25.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.9%Peter Nickeas: 6.9%Illinois Answers Project: 2.1%Unattributed Quote13.9%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 45.8%Peter Nickeas: 16.7%Illinois Answers Project: 5.0%Biased Writer Voice45.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nickeas: 0.0%Illinois Answers Project: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

72 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.