9to5Mac57%

9to5Mac Daily: July 13, 2026  Apple sues OpenAI 46%

By Seth Kurkowski0%

7/13/2026, 8:59:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 179 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,261 of 15,282 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the article peer group.

Listen to a recap of the top stories of the day from 9to5Mac. 9to5Mac Daily is available on iTunes and Apple’s Podcasts app, Stitcher, TuneIn, Google Play, or through our dedicated RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players. 
Sponsored by Backblaze: Backup you can rely on. 
Save 20% with code 9to5daily. 
New episodes of 9to5Mac Daily are recorded every weekday. 
Subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcast or your favorite podcast player to guarantee new episodes are delivered as soon as they’re available. 
Stories discussed in this episode: 
Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets 
OpenAI responds to Apple’s trade secret theft lawsuit 
Listen & Subscribe: 
Apple Podcasts 
Overcast 
RSS 
Spotify 
TuneIn 
Google Podcasts 
Subscribe to support Chance directly with 9to5Mac Daily Plus and unlock: 
Ad-free versions of every episode 
Bonus content 
Catch up on 9to5Mac Daily episodes! 
Share your thoughts! 
Drop us a line at happyhour@9to5mac.com. 
You can also rate us in Apple Podcasts or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
7.3%

179 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.