STAT49%

ARPA-H invests $160 million to make custom gene editing routine 31%

By Jason Mast0% https:47% www.statnews.com49% #43% schema42% person43% f27e81941b55aae65a8b1304575ad0800%

7/9/2026, 3:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 61 faulty-reasoning hits from 282 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (9,883 of 14,328 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the article peer group.

ARPA-H launches $160 million effort to develop custom gene editing drugs 
Program will fund seven groups over five years in hope of Baby KJ-like successes 
Jean-Christophe VERHAEGEN / AFP via Getty Images 
General Assignment Reporter 
Jason is a general assignment reporter, with particular focus on genetic medicine and rare disease. 
Confidential tips can be sent on Signal at JasonMast.77. 
ARPA-H, the U.S.’ “moonshot” agency for health research, announced Thursday that it will spend up to $160 million to push forward custom gene editing treatments for a spate of rare diseases. 
The program, called THRIVE, will back seven different teams pursuing various groups of conditions affecting different organ systems. 
Each team has a deadline of starting clinical trials by year three of the program, although some may start much sooner. 
STAT+ Exclusive Story 
Already have an account? 
Log in 
This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers 
Unlock this article  plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector  by subscribing to STAT+. 
Totals $468 per year 
for 3 months, then $399/year 
Savings start at 25%! 
$300 Annually per user 
To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+. 
biotechnology , CRISPR , gene editing , Gene therapy , HHS , rare diseases , STAT+ 
Submit a correction request Reprints 
STAT Plus: Roche ends Huntington’s gene-silencing programs 
STAT Plus: Prime wins Beam arbitration, clearing path to clinic 
Adam's Biotech Scorecard 
STAT Plus: 931 days. 
The drug approval scandal hiding in plain sight 
STAT Plus: AstraZeneca, Ionis report major trial failure with heart disease drug 
STAT Plus: The quest to save Grace  and clear the way for rare disease patients everywhere 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
21.6%

282 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.