Ex-Dodger makes shocking financial claim as jury weighs further punishment in fatal Grossman crash 50%

By Katie Jerkovich0%

6/6/2026, 5:14:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 498 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,987 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the article peer group.

Former Major League pitcher Scott Erickson said his millions are gone as the jury weighs his financial fate in the fatal crash involving two young boys in a Westlake Village crosswalk in 2020. 
Jurors must now decide whether to weigh punitive damages against both Erickson and his ex-lover Rebecca Grossman after they were found negligent in the death of 11-year-old Mark and 8-year-old Jacob Iskander. 
A jury awarded $176 million to the Iskander family on Wednesday, finding both the former professional baseball player and the Los Angeles socialite liable for the deadly crash that killed the brothers. 
During his testimony on Friday in the punitive phase of the trial, the ex-Dodger said his nearly $46 million earnings from his Major League Baseball career are practically gone. 
“I haven’t been able to get a job since the accident,” he told the courtroom. 
His MLB career ended in 2006, that along with a divorce, taxes and other bad decisions has left him with little more than $9,000 in the bank, per the report. 
However, Erickson still has $242,000 in a retirement account, equity in a condo in Las Vegas worth $200,000, and a $13,000 pension monthly from MLB, per the report. 
Grossman, who was convicted of murder for killing the two young boys with her car during a chase with Erickson, was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison in 2024. 
The former MLB pitcher was driving a separate car nearby that day, raising questions about whether the pair had been speeding together. 
Erickson, however, was never charged. 
The ex-Dodger finally addressed the tragedy when he took the stand last month in the wrongful death trial. 
He testified that he sped up when he spotted two young boys in the crosswalk moments before they were fatally struck in 2020. 
“I stepped on the gas for probably two or three seconds to get through, because I thought that was the safest process,” Erickson told the Van Nuys courtroom on May 13. 
During his testimony Friday, prosecutors questioned him about admitting his guilt for his part in the deadly crash six years later. 
“It took a jury verdict for you to come clean and admit under oath that you caused the deaths, you were part of it and you covered it up for almost six years, correct?” 
Attorney Brian Panish said, per ABC7. 
“Yes, that’s correct.” 
Erickson replied. 
The former professional baseball player also told the jury he now believes if he could’ve stopped, the Iskander brothers would be alive today. 
“I feel terrible about what happened. 
I feel really bad about my actions and some of the terrible behavior I did,” he said, per the Times report. 
“I have not been very honest. 
And no words can describe how I feel about what’s happened  I truly believe now if I could have somehow been able to stop, I probably, possibly, could have saved their lives.” 
Confirmation Bias
6.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
11.2%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
23.1%
Loss Aversion
12.4%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
9.6%
Negativity Bias
29.1%
Self-Serving Bias
12.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.6%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.2%
False Dilemma
10.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
9.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
12%
Begging the Question
6.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
6.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
6.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
6.8%
Biased Writer Voice
3.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

498 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.