NPR85%

Hantavirus: the risks, the science and what you need to know 76%

By Berly McCoy0% Emily Kwong0% Rebecca Ramirez0%

5/8/2026, 7:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 347 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,127 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the article peer group.

On May 2, the World Health Organization got an alarming report: People aboard a ship in the Atlantic Ocean were falling ill. 
The culprit is now confirmed as hantavirus, a pathogen that some rodents carry that can infect humans in rare, but often deadly, instances. 
Multiple passengers have died, and more people are showing symptoms. 
So, we're talking to Emily Abdoler, an infectious disease doctor at the University of Michigan, about the news  how common is hantavirus in humans, what are the consequences of getting it, and how can at-risk people protect themselves from it? 
If you found this episode interesting, listen to our episode on Rocky Mountain spotted fever. 
Interested in more science in the news? 
Email us your question at shortwave@npr.org. 
Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave. 
Listen to Short Wave on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. 
This episode was produced by Berly McCoy. 
It was edited by Rebecca Ramirez. 
Tyler Jones checked the facts. 
The audio engineer was Jimmy Keeley. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
27.4%
Loss Aversion
11.6%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
16.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
2.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
16.8%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
21.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7.9%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
17.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
31.1%

190 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.