SEE IT: NYPD bodycam videos show Queens house explode, hurling cops backwards 88%

By Thomas Tracy44%

4/30/2026, 6:17:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 900 faulty-reasoning hits from 314 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81.8% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,055 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the article peer group.

The explosion that destroyed a Queens home Thursday blew cops responding to a domestic clash there backward several feet, sending glass and rubble raining down upon them, dramatic body-worn camera videos show. 
But within seconds of being knocked back, the responding officers were back up, checking on each other and evacuating stunned residents  including several children  from the rubble of the home, the video shows. 
A drunken Anroop Parasaram, who had been arrested several times for domestic disputes with his wife at the home on 130th St. near 109th Ave. in South Ozone Park, forced his way into the home at about 2:45 a.m. and threatened his family with a knife, according to cops. 
He had several cannisters of liquid with him which police believe he used to set the five-alarm inferno as cops showed up to the scene and were about to open the door. 
As a cop tries the door to the basement with keys given to him by the suspect's estranged wife, an explosion erupts. 
“You alright? 
You alright?” 
one cop can be heard asking his stunned brothers in blue. 
Moments later, cops were taking toddlers in diapers from their panicked moms as the fire grew and they hastily evacuated the building, the 90-second clip released by the NYPD shows. 
Parasaram was found dead “beneath the rubble caused by the explosion,” NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said. 
Tisch praised the officers who responded. 
“They had just been thrown to the ground by an explosion. 
And in that moment, with no clear sense of what else they might be walking into, they made the decision to keep moving forward,” Tisch said. 
“Their focus stayed exactly where it needed to be: on the people inside, on getting those children out, and on making sure that situation didn't claim innocent lives.” 
Confirmation Bias
10.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
10.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
8.3%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
37.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
15.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
36.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
20.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
40.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
17.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
20.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
1.3%
Biased Writer Voice
35.7%
Indoctrination
8.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
9.6%

314 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.