Billionaire details Eric Swalwell's final days holed up inside his $26M mansion  and brutal eviction 83%

By Josh Koehn0% Benjamin Brown0%

4/14/2026, 2:22:47 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 511 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.6% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,902 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the article peer group.

Eric Swalwell’s billionaire benefactor, Stephen Cloobeck, says he cut off the disgraced politician in an explosive last meeting, telling him to get the “f—k out” of his house. 
In a matter of days, the former Democratic front-runner for California governor has had a stunning political collapse  suspending his campaign before announcing his resignation from Congress on Monday amid accusations of sexual assault from four women, including an ex-staffer who claims Swalwell raped her while drunk at an April 2024 charity gala. 
“I am no longer associated with a man that takes advantage of women,” Cloobeck said. 
“I support women’s rights.” 
The Post confirmed Swalwell was holed up in Cloobeck’s $26 million Beverly Hills mansion as the allegations against him came to light, even filming a video furiously denying the rape and sexual assault claims from a room inside the 9,700-square-foot home. 
Swalwell, who married Brittney Watts in 2016 and has three children, was always a “gentleman” when he stayed at the house and would send “pastries and cookies” two days later, according to Cloobeck. 
But the billionaire’s hospitality quickly took a turn as bipartisan pressure ramped up for Swalwell to resign from Congress. 
Cloobeck offered new details into those final moments, telling The Post that Swalwell “apologized” before the billionaire “ripped him a new f—king a—hole.” 
“I was with my counsel and we had a chat with him, I just told him: ‘You busted the trust,’” Cloobeck said. 
“‘I’m shocked, I’m disturbed and get the f—k out of here.’ 
Then I walked away and that was it.” 
Cloobeck also confirmed to The Post that it was his lawyer who initially defended Swalwell on CNN Friday night against the allegations. 
“All he did was help Eric out going on CNN. 
He was advised to go on himself, he didn’t want to do it and I asked my counsel to do it,” Cloobeck said. 
But the goodwill and funding have now dried up, as Cloobeck vowed to provide “zero financial help” moving forward. 
The billionaire also denied he or his business entities ever issued non-disclosure agreements on Swalwell’s behalf  something that his accusers said prevented them from speaking out sooner. 
“There were no NDAs by any of my entities for any of these women,” he said. 
Swalwell, who promised to “fight the serious, false allegation made against me,” also faces a sexual assault investigation from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. 
Here’s the latest on the allegations against Rep. 
Eric Swalwell 
 Eric Swalwell under investigation by Manhattan DA over alleged sex assault of staffer 
 Eric Swalwell cowers in billionaire pal’s $26M mansion  as rape claim sparks career freefall 
 Four women detail horrific sexual assault, misconduct claims against Eric Swalwell  including ex-staffer who alleges he raped her 
 Eric Swalwell paid illegal Brazilian live-in nanny under the table with campaign funds, complaint alleges 
 Influencer’s husband threatens Eric Swalwell after he allegedly bombarded her with nudes and turned up at her house 
Confirmation Bias
12.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
21.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
32.1%
Loss Aversion
3.7%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
8.4%
Negativity Bias
54.2%
Self-Serving Bias
9.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.2%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
12.1%
Primacy Effect
9.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
5.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
14.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
27.2%
Begging the Question
11.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
14.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
16.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
6.5%
Anecdotal
18.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
4.5%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
13.1%
Biased Writer Voice
31.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

511 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.