NPR85%

The psychology behind why you dread small talk 

By Emily Kwong0% Regina G. Barber0% Ailsa Chang0% Rachel Carlson0% Jeffrey Pierre

4/17/2026, 7:00:00 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Do you avoid small talk with that co-worker near the water cooler or that neighbor in the elevator? 
Well, if so, you might want to think again. 
According to a study just published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, even when participants were primed that a conversation would be boring, they ultimately found it more interesting than expected. 
Researchers looked at nine different experiments that totaled 1800 participants and found the same result each time: Conversations about boring topics are actually enjoyable and engaging. 
Elizabeth Trinh, the lead author of the study, mentioned these results may be due to the loneliness epidemic described in the 2023 report out of the US Surgeon General's office. 
Trinh says the most interesting part of the results was that engaging with another person drove enjoyment more than the topic itself. 
"So people assume that interest comes from having a fascinating subject that you're talking about," she said. 
"But in reality, what makes conversations really enjoyable is that it's the sense of connection." 
She suggested you lean into small talk and reap the benefits. 
Interested in more social science? 
Email us your question at shortwave@npr.org. 
Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave. 
Listen to Short Wave on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. 
This episode was produced by Rachel Carlson and Jeffrey Pierre. 
It was edited by Rebecca Ramirez and Christopher Intagliata. 
Tyler Jones checked the facts. 
The audio engineers were Maggie Luthar and Ted Mebane. 
Confirmation Bias
8.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
9.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
23.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
9.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
5.7%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
6.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
3%
Indoctrination
13.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
15.9%

264 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.