NPR85%

DHS says immigration agents appear to have lied about shooting in Minnesota79%

By Sergio Martínez-Beltrán84%

2/13/2026, 10:04:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 601 faulty-reasoning hits from 469 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,565 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the article peer group.

Two federal immigration agents involved in the shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant in Minneapolis last month appear to have lied about the details of the incident, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said Friday. 
The agents have been placed on administrative leave after "a joint review by ICE and the Department of Justice of video evidence has revealed that sworn testimony provided by two separate officers appears to have made untruthful statements," the spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, said. 
The rare acknowledgment of potential missteps by ICE agents comes after the agency's acting director, Todd Lyons, told Congress on Thursday that ICE has conducted 37 investigations into officers' use of force over the past year. 
He didn't say whether anyone has been fired. 
McLaughlin said the agency is investigating the January 14 shooting of the Venezuelan immigrant, and the officers involved could be fired or criminally prosecuted for any violations. 
"The men and women of ICE are entrusted with upholding the rule of law and are held to the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and ethical conduct," McLaughlin said in Friday's statement. 
"Violations of this sacred sworn oath will not be tolerated." 
DHS initially said the officer fired a shot to "save his life" after being "ambushed and attacked" by three immigrants with a snow shovel and a broom handle during a "targeted traffic stop." 
Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, the subject of the traffic stop, was injured after getting shot in the leg. 
Another Venezuelan man, Alfredo Aljorna, was also accused of attacking the officers. 
However, Minnesota U.S. Attorney Dan Rosen on Thursday dropped the charges against them. 
McLaughlin did not respond to questions about whether the agency stands by its initial statement describing the agent's behavior during the incident as self-defense. 
Since the beginning, eyewitness accounts contradicted the statements made by DHS related to the shooting of Sosa-Celis. 
His partner, Indriany Mendoza Camacho, told Minnesota Public Radio last week she was present the night of the shooting, and that Sosa-Celis was trying to separate the agent and the other Venezuelan man so both the immigrants could get into a house. 
"I'm a witness, I saw everything, and my partner never grabbed anything to hit him or anything like that," she said. 
The shooting happened during Operation Metro Surge, an aggressive immigration crackdown that brought about 3,000 federal agents to Minnesota starting in December. 
The Trump administration on Thursday announced it was ending Operation Metro Surge. 
The operation led to more than 4,000 arrests of undocumented immigrants, according to White House border czar Tom Homan, and the killing of two U.S. citizens, Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti. 
Those shootings are also being investigated by federal authorities. 
An internal preliminary review conducted by Customs and Border Protection into Pretti's death also contradicted the Trump administration's initial narrative about his shooting. 
Confirmation Bias
8.5%
Anchoring Bias
21.3%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
35.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
22.2%
Self-Serving Bias
11.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
11.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
6.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
6.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

469 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.